Employer-specific work permit? Since 17 September 2026 IRCC applies four genuineness tests to every job offer, LMIA or not.
Check your offerRefusal management · 2026
Every refused application carries a clock, and most are counted in days — not weeks. Find yours in under a minute, whatever was refused.
What changed
Visitor, super and transit visas, visitor records, study permits and work permits — including extensions.
Extended to most permanent residence decisions, filed from inside or outside Canada. H&C remains excluded.
The “high-risk environment” limit was deleted. Six months of bank statements is now the working standard.
Selected changes that affect refusals — not a complete list. Source: canada.ca
Know the difference
The distinction decides everything: whether anyone will look at new evidence, whether you get a hearing, and whether the decision-maker can substitute their own judgment for the officer's.
The IAD and RAD re-decide the merits. They hear testimony, weigh humanitarian factors, and can allow an appeal on facts that arose after the refusal — an income that has since risen, a relationship that has since deepened.
The Federal Court asks a narrower question: was the decision reasonable, and was the process fair? It generally cannot receive new evidence and does not substitute its own decision — a win sends the file back to a different officer.
A fresh application built around the recorded concerns. For most temporary resident refusals this is not the fallback — it is the strongest route, because it is the only one where new evidence gets full weight.
Refiling before the concern is fixed buys the same answer at the same price.
What decision-makers actually write
Refusal letters tick categories; the notes explain them. These are the findings that appear most often, and what each really means once it is in your file.
Procedural fairness
IRCC issues a procedural fairness letter when a concern is serious enough that deciding without hearing from you would be unfair — document authenticity, a possible misrepresentation, an eligibility problem, or an inadmissibility finding.
Everything turns on what you file. Answer the specific allegation point by point — not the application as a whole.
Primary documents where authenticity is doubted, and nothing extraneous. Volume is not persuasion.
The letter sets it, usually between seven and thirty days. A late response is generally treated as no response at all.
Most refusals cost you an application. A finding of misrepresentation under IRPA s. 40 costs you 5 years — inadmissible to Canada, every application in that period refused on that basis alone, and the finding visible to other countries that ask.
It does not require an intention to deceive. An omission an officer considers material is enough. If your letter uses that word, treat the response as the most consequential document you will ever file — and do not write it alone.
How the courts have shaped what an officer owes you: the order that forces a decision out of a file left sitting, the standard every refusal is measured against, and what happens when the record and the reasons do not match.
What a refusal review includes
A refusal is evidence. It tells you precisely where a decision-maker stopped being satisfied — and a second application that doesn't move that specific line is a second fee for the same answer.
We start from the officer’s own notes, not the checkbox letter — and order records only where the notes are absent, redacted, or the file predates the transparency change.
Which forum, which clock, and the date it closes. If judicial review is the right route, we say so and refer you to counsel rather than let the window lapse.
What is fixable with evidence, what needs a changed plan, and what means you should not refile yet. The third category is the one that saves money.
New evidence answering each recorded concern, exhibits an officer can navigate, and a submission letter that walks them through it.
Every prior refusal declared, in every future application. Non-disclosure is treated far more seriously than the refusal itself.
Sometimes the right advice is to wait, strengthen the underlying facts, and file once. We will tell you when that is the case.
By stream
Next step
A refusal review reads the decision-maker's notes against what was filed, confirms your forum and your deadline in writing, and tells you plainly whether to appeal, respond, reapply, or wait. Brampton, London, or remotely anywhere in Canada.
Reviewed August 2026 — general information only, not legal advice, and no consultant–client relationship is created by reading this page. Deadlines shown are the statutory defaults and run from when you were notified, which is not always the date printed on the letter; several forums deem receipt a set number of days after that date. Confirm your own dates before relying on them. Appeals to the IAD and RAD and applications to the Federal Court are conducted by lawyers — where that is the right route we will say so and refer you. Source: canada.ca, officer decision notes.
The questions we hear most on this topic, answered by our consultants. The full list is in the Help Centre.
More questions on this topic are answered in the Help Centre.
Refusal review
Send a few details. A licensed RCIC reads your profile personally, then replies with the routes that genuinely fit, the ones that do not, and the consultation fee and next available times.
CHK Immigration Services, Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (CICC). Offices in Brampton and London, Ontario. Submitting this form does not create a client–consultant relationship; IRCC makes all final decisions. Prefer to talk first? Call 647-948-7200 or book a paid consultation.
Free, fee-exempt options exist. Your employer or partner is not asked.
